alias Bruce.

President Obama crying over 20 dead children will change nothing.

I hate to put it that way. I'm absolutely certain that the President felt every tear he shed.

But the problem underlying this tragedy and the dozens of mass shootings that have preceded it goes deeper than an ocean of tears. And a clear eye will tell you that Obama is of as little use in the fight for gun control as he is in most fights. Everything you need to know about the futility of asking him for more can be found in his coded words about guns in his response to the Newtown, Connecticut shootings: "We're going to have to come together to meaningful action on this, regardless of the politics."

I don't want to dwell on this, because Obama will never be part of a real solution to the American gun murder epidemic -- which, by the way, claims a far greater number of little-noticed people of color than it does mediagenic suburban whites. But let's quickly dissect Obama's veiled reference to gun control and see what's really there.

Obama's words: "We're going to have to come together to meaningful action on this, regardless of the politics." Truth: America's gun-crazy policies are all about politics (as well as economics), and "coming together" is a guarantee of inaction. Gun proliferation and its resulting climate of fear are essential to the monied interests of big gun manufacturers, and are central to the political interests of corporate-owned demagogic congresspersons and senators who sell fear of the other to scared white people. (Let's tell it like it is: citizens of color are, by and large, not clamoring for easy access to guns.) Any challenge to this gun hegemony must by its nature be political. And "coming together" will never, ever win such a victory. All sides "coming together" to defeat the rule of guns is as absurd as all sides "coming together" to defeat slavery in the 19th century. Or Jim Crow in the 20th century. Or the denial of women's reproductive rights right up through today. In each case, what has won the day has not been all sides "coming together," but, instead, those committed to justice proving themselves unstoppable in the face of brutal opposition. The same is true of the gun war.

Which is why Obama will never be part of the solution.

What is and always will be the solution is when enough Americans generate enough of an understanding of the root of the problem and accrue enough rage about its bloody consequences to demand – through strategically-organized protest, civil disobedience, and economic and legislative outcry – that guns not be sold like candy.

To get an idea of just how cowardly Obama is on gun control, read yesterday's remarks by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg – the guy who did his best to crush the Occupy movement and who presides over NYC's infamous stop-and-frisk policy – in which Bloomberg tried to prod Obama beyond tears and into action on reining in guns.

And to hear someone who has actually experienced a mass shooting talk back to Obama about the Newtown massacre, watch this video of Steve Barton, who survived being shot in the face and neck in the recent Aurora, Colorado theater shooting that killed 12 people and injured 58 others.

The video of police pepper spraying peaceful students at UC Davis

 

doesn't require a lot of commentary: an overweight, battle-outfitted cop following orders and flexing his flabby sense of power over a group of passively sitting demonstrators because somebody told him he should or could. The message is clear: The ruling class understands that OWS is ripping the scab off the suffering of the working and middle class and the poor, and the elites are afraid of the truthful and disciplined anger cultivated by the OWS movement, and they are determined to shut it down before it spreads into anything like a mass uprising against corporate monarchy. The bosses' chief weapon, to paraphrase the hysterical enforcer in the old Monty Python "Spanish Inquisition" sketch, is fear: fear that if you protest you will be injured, fear that your dissent will place you in personal physical danger, fear that gathering in public against a Wall Street dictatorship will put you more at risk than you can possibly afford. You can be angry, is the message, but you'd damn well better keep your anger at home and not make public trouble for us.

This may well be an explicitly coordinated strategy. We know, for instance, that the mayors of many cities with active OWS movements have shared ideas in large-scale conference calls about how to respond. We also know that law enforcement has both the national means and the motive to share recommended methodologies for cutting off OWS participants at the knees.

In any case, the plutocrats are scared, and police are being called upon to kick serious ass. This isn't at all new in poor communities of color, where illegal and humiliating public body searches and sodomy attacks and cold-blooded murders by police have been going on for decades as a tool of terror and control. But it is new for today's generation of college-aged and twenty-something mostly-white Wall Street occupiers and protesters, accustomed as they are to freedom from rampant police abuse. Further, this kind of explicitly political national movement of young people (of all colors) against capitalist injustice is something the United States has not seen for nearly a half-century. And so police at places like UC Davis, and Oakland, and Portland, are now being called upon to review the DEFCON pages of their manuals, to pull on their riot gear, and to report for Conan the Barbarian duty.

White kids being brutalized by swaggering over-armored cops doesn't play well on national television. The courage and discipline of a crowd of students who responded by peacefully forcing the storm troopers to retreat while they chanted "Shame on you!" and "You can go!" also makes a strong impression on national TV. Just as powerful (see video below) was the ruthlessly silent shaming of weak UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi by a sea of students who drowned Katehi in their deafening silence as she slunk though them to her car after unsuccessfully begging for their understanding after the pepper-spraying attack. The UC Davis faculty and many others have called for her resignation.

The War on Drugs provided a pretext for militarization of police in low-income communities of color. The culture of police thuggery, having been honed in places like the Bronx and South Central Los Angeles, is now being brought to bear against a potential national anti-corporate movement that taps into popular grievances. We'll see how this plays out. My bet is that OWS and the evolving ideas and actions it has set into motion will give the rich a run for their money.

 

The latest "Stop 'Stop & Frisk'" civil disobedience action in NYC took place

on Saturday with a march to the 103rd police precinct in Queens, near where the unarmed Sean Bell was shot to death on the eve of his wedding day by five NYPD officers who fired 50 bullets.

Saturday's SS&F action, one of a continuing series of protests that have involved Cornel West, Carl Dix, and community residents and members of Occupy Wall Street among others, was in part a memorial to Bell. 20 people were arrested and jailed. Reports here and here provide details.

More protests are planned against Stop and Frisk, an outright police state tactic by which NYC police stop, jack up, and feel up hundreds of thousands of citizens each year for no defined cause. The vast majority are black and Latino and nearly all of them are innocent of any crime; practically none are arrested. The obscene statistics are here. It's all about police using fear, trauma, and intimidation as weapons of power.

More and more people are stepping forward to insist that this unconstitutional police thuggery has to stop.

Welcome to the 2011 Days of Rage.

In the past day alone, mass Occupy Wall Street actions, as chronicled here and here, give us a hint, just a hint, of what can happen when a too-mad-to-be-denied constituency hugely outnumbers the blue-clad and helmeted enforcers who are paid to subdue them.

The most eloquent statement I have yet heard from the decentralized OWS movement came from one of its New York City leaders, who said on the radio that OWS actions, spectacular and dramatic though they are, serve as but a vehicle for a kind of colossal public education on the way the American and global capitalist economy really works -- and on the massive power that can be unleashed when popular awareness merges with popular rage.

It is worth repeating again and again: although most Americans are not part of OWS, most do agree with its stated positions against income inequality and the rule of the rich. When was the last time you saw those explicit and widespread public grievances forced onto the front pages and the anchor desks of the corporate media?

An interesting post by "Actor" on the connection between Occupy Wall Street and the Euro debt crisis

can be found here.

In short, American banks are fiscally threatened by the possible collapse of one or more European Union economies -- just at the time that the U.S's political cover for bailing out banks is being eroded by the popular message of OWS, which is targeting some banks for boycotts and civil disobedience actions.

It's worth a read.

If you don't think Occupy Wall Street is part of a serious movement,

then read this about the massive clashes underway this very minute in NYC, where police have at times been overwhelmed by huge crowds;

and this chronology of what has happened in NYC since early this morning, including the delay of the opening bell of the New York Stock Exchange;

and this about how cities are braced for more.

I've said it before and I will keep saying it: the elites have no idea of the depth and breadth of the anger felt toward them in America.

So what does Tuesday's court ban of Occupy Wall Street camping in Zuccotti Park

really mean for OWS?

The short answer is that we don't know. The eviction could mean that occupiers will insistently return to Zuccotti with tents, and risk almost sure arrest to dramatize the repression of the occupation by the city and its monied sponsors (read: banks and others spooked by the newly unrestful peasantry). It could mean that the park will remain a site for (carefully police-controlled and -monitored) protest without further attempts at overnight stays. It could mean that former park occupiers will take residency in other public NYC spaces, or move cleverly and strategically from one site to another. It could mean that OWS in NYC will graduate to overtly political organizing that is not dependent on specific spaces. It could mean that the NYC occupation, already facing the question of what was to happen as winter descended, will be unintentionally strengthened and pushed to the next level of practical function by the city's forced eviction and the attention and outrage it has garnered. It could mean that OWS will accelerate toward a splintering into factions with differing agendas for what is wrong with American capitalism and what is to be done about it. Or it could mean any combination of these things, along with things not yet envisioned. OWS is a nationwide and international phenomenon, and the lessons of Oakland and Portland and many other cities, in addition to New York, are neither coalesced nor completed.

There is one clear thing, however, that the eviction does not mean. It does not mean the end of what OWS represents, which is a broad anger with the corruption and unfairness of the American (and global) economy and a fierce desire for remedies. That anger and hunger -- reflected not only in the shared actions and declarations of occupiers but in national opinion polls about taxes on millionaires and reining in the rule of the rich -- is still here because the conditions that create and sustain it are still here. So, like mercury in a maze, the anger will flow from one closed channel to the next open one. And the next. The richest of the rich, who like all ruling classes lack the ability to save themselves from themselves, will ensure through their reflexive greed and ironclad hubris that the anger and hunger of the rest of us is steadily nurtured via a regime of obscene unfairness and economic and ecological unsustainability. 

The funny thing about repression and injustice is that its inability to stop itself also makes for unstoppable and ever-shifting resistance.

Occupy Wall Street in NYC was raided and cleared by police in riot gear early this morning, but a court order

hours later told the city to allow protestors to return and camp out. As I write, a hearing is reportedly in progress regarding the court order.

You likely already know about all this. I learned of it at Agonist.org at 3:30 a.m. The violent eviction by police isn't a surprise. The court order, though, is a wild card. In any case, whether the encampment can legally resume or not, Mayor Bloomberg is fooling himself if he thinks this is going away.

More later.